The problem
The compliance burden grows faster than manual processes can absorb it
Every new product, market, channel and counterparty adds reviewable events. Headcount is the only lever most compliance functions have — so teams sample, prioritise, and hope the gap never gets examined. That gap is where the risk lives.
300+
regulatory changes issued globally per business day
Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence, 2025
69%
of organisations find regulations too complex or too numerous to track
Secureframe compliance research, 2025
4–8 wks
typically spent preparing evidence for a single exam or internal audit
Industry analysis of compliance operations, 2026
+60%
rise in operating costs spent on compliance versus pre-crisis levels
Deloitte, Cost of Compliance
Coverage
A sample is a statement about what you didn't look at.
IntelCS reviews the whole population against your configured requirements, then routes only the exceptions to a human. Reviewers stop reading files and start deciding cases.
Manual review today
~4%
Sampled, queue-driven, inconsistent between reviewers.
IntelCS
100%
Every in-scope record, same requirements, same result on every run.
How it works
Four steps, from your rulebook to defensible evidence.
01
Configure requirements
Your obligations, policies and internal standards become explicit, versioned rules — expressed in the language your reviewers already use.
02
Ingestion
Documents, tickets, transactions, calls and records stream into your dedicated IntelCS instance over read-only connectors. Nothing is passed to an external service.
03
Deterministic review
HaloRT enables IntelCS to execute every record against your requirements.
Any review can be reproduced and audited
04
Evidence & escalation
Exceptions route to the right reviewer with the rule, the citation and the reasoning attached. The audit pack is a by-product, not a project.
Why IntelCS
Automation a regulator can follow, line by line.
Most AI tooling fail the two questions regulated firms have to answer: how was our data used, and how was the result determined? IntelCS answers these at the get go.
Who we serve
Ten sectors. One recurring problem.
Banking & credit unions
AML/KYC files, lending disclosures, marketing review
Insurance
Underwriting, claims handling, conduct & fair treatment
Healthcare providers
Clinical documentation, coding, privacy & access
Pharma & life sciences
GxP records, batch documentation, promotional review
Medical devices
Design history files, complaints, post-market surveillance
Energy & utilities
Safety cases, environmental reporting, market conduct
Defence & gov contractors
CUI handling, CMMC evidence, supplier flow-down
Aviation & transport
Maintenance records, crew compliance, safety reporting
Gambling & gaming
Safer-gambling interventions, affordability, advertising
Telecoms
Consumer duty, lawful intercept, data retention
Corporate finance
Deal files, conflicts checks, disclosure & approvals
What changes
Compliance stops being the reason you can't.
When review capacity is no longer a function of headcount, the constraint moves. New products ship on the business timetable. New markets don't need a hiring round first. And the board gets a number for coverage instead of an assurance.
Our aim? 100% compliance for your organisation.
Growth decoupled from compliance headcount
Volume doubles without the review backlog doubling with it.
Findings caught in hours, not during an audit
Remediation happens while it's still cheap and self-reported.
Audit prep becomes a query, not a quarter
Evidence, rule version and reasoning are already linked to every decision.
Specialists focus on the reviews that matter
Your most expensive people stop reading files that turn out to be fine.
Sources
Regulatory change volume — Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence, cited in AI Agents in Regulatory Compliance, 2026
Regulatory complexity — Secureframe, Compliance Statistics & Trends
Compliance operating cost growth — Deloitte, Cost of Compliance and Regulatory Productivity
Total compliance cost burden — PwC UK & TheCityUK, Understanding the true costs of compliance